<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analysis of Chemtura Corp bonds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.notananalyst.com/2010/04/02/analysis-of-chemtura-corp-bonds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.notananalyst.com/2010/04/02/analysis-of-chemtura-corp-bonds/</link>
	<description>From Chaos Comes Opportunity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:59:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: michelangelo</title>
		<link>http://www.notananalyst.com/2010/04/02/analysis-of-chemtura-corp-bonds/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>michelangelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notananalyst.com/?p=1227#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I have constructed a waterfall analysis with updated info, which I can send you on an e-mail, and I came up with a $2.01 a share with an EV of $2,509 (adding a multiple of 7.7 to $325 EBITDA). This assumes a Dyacetil litigation charge of $300mm. Maybe that&#039;s to conservative, but I&#039;d rather be that than aggressive here. What multiple are you using for EBITDA? 

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have constructed a waterfall analysis with updated info, which I can send you on an e-mail, and I came up with a $2.01 a share with an EV of $2,509 (adding a multiple of 7.7 to $325 EBITDA). This assumes a Dyacetil litigation charge of $300mm. Maybe that&#8217;s to conservative, but I&#8217;d rather be that than aggressive here. What multiple are you using for EBITDA? </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ardeus</title>
		<link>http://www.notananalyst.com/2010/04/02/analysis-of-chemtura-corp-bonds/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>ardeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 03:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.notananalyst.com/?p=1227#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t done a whole lot of work on this name yet, but how about the pre-petition equity? It sounds like if you conservatively value this pig at 6x on $285M EBITDA, you are getting significant value for the equity holders. 

I understand about the &quot;adequate protection&quot; laws and its exclusion to shareholders, but the equity committee may have a strong case here. After deducting all senior claims, I am getting about $675m - $795M equity value. Based on 254.1 million shares outstanding, thats worth about $2.65 - $3.13 a share.

I am looking at this incorrectly? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t done a whole lot of work on this name yet, but how about the pre-petition equity? It sounds like if you conservatively value this pig at 6x on $285M EBITDA, you are getting significant value for the equity holders. </p>
<p>I understand about the &#8220;adequate protection&#8221; laws and its exclusion to shareholders, but the equity committee may have a strong case here. After deducting all senior claims, I am getting about $675m &#8211; $795M equity value. Based on 254.1 million shares outstanding, thats worth about $2.65 &#8211; $3.13 a share.</p>
<p>I am looking at this incorrectly? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

